The Skin I Live In (La Piel
Que Habito)
Reviewed
by
Damien Straker on
December 17th, 2011
Transmission presents
a film directed by
Pedro
Almodovar
Screenplay
by
Agustin Almodovar and Pedro Almodovar, based on the novel "Tarantula"
by Thierry Jonquet
Starring:
Antonio
Banderas, Elena Anaya, Marisa Paredes, Roberto Alamo and Jan Cornet
Running
Time:
117 mins
Rating:
MA
Released:
December 26th,
2011
|
8/10
|
A woman named Vera (Elena Anaya) is being held prisoner
in a
beautiful manor home. She doesn't struggle and is offered proper food
and
materials through a slot in the wall. Holding her there is a scientist,
Robert
Ledgard (Antonio Banderas), and his servant Marilia (Marisa Paredes).
Robert is
experimenting on skin grafting because he failed to save his wife after
a car
accident. He is not meant to be experimenting on people and is warned
that he
will be reported to a scientific board if continues his unorthodox
approach.
Trouble arises when Robert's brother Zeca (Roberto Alamo) arrives at
the house,
dressed for Carnaval, and tries to free the woman, thinking she is
someone
else. This leads to a flashback where we learn the rather tragic story
of Robert's
wife, his daughter and what led him to imprison the girl locked in the
room.
Think twice about The Skin I
Live In (La Piel Que Habito). That's
not a question of whether Pedro Almodóvar's film is amiss or not. It is a masterfully told
thriller but one
that must considered strictly in terms of doubleness. This is a film
concerned
by doppelgangers, doubleness and repetition. In one of the opening
scenes at a
conference, Robert tells us that a face is part of the human identity.
This is
the basis for many of the film's classical philosophical questions,
primarily
how one can be in love with an illusion. It is Robert's intention to
duplicate
his wife through his experiments and research, negating genuine feeling
and
emotion. It most chilling conveyed through a voyeuristic framing
device. Inside
Robert's house is a large screen where he can watch the holding cell of
Vera.
He watches her on the screen, lying naked on her side, yet when he
enters the
room himself he sees that she has tried to kill herself. In this one
sequence,
we realise the power of human perception and by contrast, personal
desire.
I'm also convinced that the film is also embedded in
Platonic
philosophy, specifically Book VII of The Republic: The Allegory of the
Cave,
where prisoners are chained up in a cave and can only view the shadows
of
objects. Plato associates real tangible form with knowledge. Consider
that the
characters in the film are like prisoners and that the bodies they've
lived in
are the shadows, what they believe are real forms in the world. Yet
outside
triggers, like in the case of one sad character a mirror, reveal the
truth and
the reality about their transformation and a new perspective on
tangible form.
Cinematically, Almodóvar has
always been fascinated by Hitchcock-like dramas, involving murder,
scandal and
secrets. This film is, I think, his tribute to Vertigo (1958),
which was also about a man fascinated by the
duplication, perception and illusion of his wife, through an artificial
embodiment.
At its most personal though, the film is about Almodóvar himself, an openly gay man, acknowledging his own
femineity. No
matter what our identity is, what face or body shape is, or how people
perceive
us, there is nothing more unconquerable than the human mind and its
ability to
think and feel for itself. Real desire cannot be changed, invented or
duplicated. Hence, why particular actions are repeated by different
characters
in the film.
Philosophy and intertextuality aside, this is a
tremendously
efficient thriller, with only a few bumps along the way. There are two
scenes
in this film involving sexual violence that I found
challenging to watch. They're harsh and
unflinchingly staged. However, they are not just for cheap shock or
sensationalism but eventually revealed as integral points to the
narrative. Almodóvar takes his time to tell this
story and tests our patience with some of these difficult scenes. Our
reward is
that we are provided with clarity towards both the plotting and the
characters motivations.
In terms of design, I liked the realism applied to the scientific
elements as
well. Most Hollywood thrillers throw a white coat over their scientists
and
they're ready to cure malaria. The scientific equipment here looks and
feels
tangible, which brings some credibility to the insane narrative.
Meanwhile, Banderas
is fairly one-note here but he remains in tune with the film's cold
tone. It is
refreshing to see him in something that isn't self-parodying and in his
narrow
corridor of brooding, he is strong enough. Although a tribute to
Hitchcock this
is as far from a Hollywood thriller as a film can get. It is risky,
original
and profound, recommended for the patient viewer.
|