One Day
Reviewed
by Damien
Straker on
August 24nd, 2011
Universal Pictures Australia and Focus Features presents
a film directed by Lone
Scherfig
Screenplay
by David Nicholls based
on his novel "One
Day"
Starring:
Anne Hathaway, Jim Sturgess and Patricia Clarkson
Running
Time: 108 minutes
Rating: TBA
Released:
September 1st, 2011
|
4/10
|
In
the late 80s
a girl named Emma (Anne Hathaway) is a college student who meets fellow
graduate
Dexter (Jim Sturgess). They’re about to sleep together one evening but
decide
to remain friends instead. Over the course of twenty years we see how
circumstances and other people have kept them divided when they just
want to be
together. Dexter finds himself hosting a ghastly television show, while
being warned
by his sick mother (Patricia Clarkson) that he isn’t a particularly
nice person
anymore. He insists that he just wants to have fun, despite being
critically
panned and moving between women. Emma works her way up from a job in a
fast
food restaurant, to a teacher and then eventually into a successful
author. To
the distress of Dexter she has a serious relationship with an obnoxious
comedian, which puts her real desires on hold. Late in the timeline,
Dexter is
married rather unhappily and has a baby girl to look after.
An
unlikeable
leading man makes this one day too many. It’s impossible to say what
type of
movie One Day is. It postures as a
comedy but it barely raises a single laugh. And though it also lacks
dramatic
impact for much of its length too, its one climax is so shocking and
over the
top that it will leave a sour taste in your mouth. Do not consider this
as a
date movie. You will not be popular. You also have to wonder late in
the movie
what the point was. Director Lone Scherfig (An
Education, 2009) tries to end
things on a very syrupy note. That’s very nice for one of the
characters but
unrewarding for the audience who have waded through twenty years in the
lives
of these unappealing characters for nothing. The message is ultimately
a very
obvious, unoriginal and simple one: that life pulls people in opposite
directions but happiness can be found in one single moment. Using an
extended
chronological structure is a gimmick. It allows for little onscreen
titles to
appear in the frame, just like in (500)
Days of Summer (2009) but it refuses to enrich character. A film
like Blue Valentine (2010) is infinitively
more intelligent because it realises that character is structure. It
contrasts
the past and present day to visualise the changing personalities of its
leads
and the impact on their relationship. The script by David Nicholls,
adapting
his own novel, lacks this kind of sophistication.
Having
the film move through such an extensive period suggests that there will
be
arching transformations in the characters. But unfortunately Sturgess
remains
continuously unlikeable all throughout this movie. His character is
arrogant,
rude, promiscuous and irresponsible. And briefly touching on his
fractured
relationship with his parents does not make him anymore sympathetic.
Patricia
Clarkson is barely in this movie because she has so few scenes and I
wasn’t
moved by her appearances as the film intended. One of the golden rules
of the
romantic comedy is broken here: you don’t understand why Emma and
Dexter belong
together. This is a detriment to the film’s plotting and the motives of
the
characters. We’re left wondering what this apparently sophisticated
woman continues
to see in this buffoon, especially when she’s already with better
company. Even
after that huge climax Dexter still has a moment of madness. Only at
the very
end does he wake up to himself. The actors aren’t really to blame. Anne
Hathaway is such a pleasant actress in almost everything she does,
comedy or
otherwise. But this sketchy, underwritten role wastes her talents and
doesn’t
stretch her chops at all. She’s made to look dorky and uptight with her
oversized glasses, only to move into little but quirkiness. And Jim
Sturgess
who I liked in Across the Universe (2007)
and The Way Back (2010) is gifted
too, with no shortage of
personality. He just happens to be playing a real jerk. If that’s what
he
intended, he certainly succeeded. As far as the rebirth of frank
romantic-comedies goes this is a pretty uninspired and limp entry.
|