AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition CPU
AMD have once again thrown another curve ball into the market with the
introduction of their new Phenom II processor, the AMD Phenom II X4 965
Black Edition CPU which not only supports a powerful and sturdy
quad-core unit but it runs at a lightning speed 3.4Ghz.
As per previous
models, the Phenom II X4 965 is backward compatible with certain
motherboards, supports DDR3 and is quite affordable and can be found
around $380AUD at the time of this article. In essence, this CPU is
giving Intel, their competition a true run for their money and a
bigger share of the market.
Match that with the Dragon platform and the
Phenom II X4
965 is not only built for power but also speed, ensuring that gamers,
designers and the like have the power available when and where it matters most.
Still a little bit doubtful? Check the specifications below.
Specifications
Model Number |
X4 965 BE |
Processor Frequency |
3.4GHz |
L3 Cache Size |
6MB L3 |
Nominal Voltage |
0.875-1.5V |
Common AM3 Specs |
L1 Cache Sizes: |
64K of L1
instruction and 64K of L1 data cache per core |
L2 Cache Sizes: |
512KB of L2
data cache per core |
L3 Cache Size: |
6MB (shared)
|
Memory Controller Type: |
Integrated
128-bit wide memory controller * |
Memory Controller Speed: |
Up to 2.0GHz
with Dual Dynamic Power Management (all current AM3
processors) |
Types of Memory Supported: |
Support for
unregistered DIMMs up to PC2 8500 (DDR2-1066MHz) -AND-
PC3 (DDR3-1333MHz)** |
HyperTransport 3.0 Link: |
One
16-bit/16-bit link @ up to 4.0GHz full duplex (2.0GHz x2) |
Total Processor Bandwidth: |
Up to 37.3 GB/s
total bandwidth |
Packaging: |
Socket AM3
938-pin organic micro pin grid array (micro-PGA) |
Fab location: |
Global
Foundaries Fab 1 Module 1 |
Process Technology: |
45-nanometer
DSL SOI (silicon-on-insulator) technology |
Approximate Transistor count: |
~ 758 million
(45nm) |
Approximate Die Size: |
258 mm2 (45nm) |
Max Ambient Case Temp / X4 CPUs: |
65o
Celsius |
Nominal Voltage: |
0.825-1.425V |
Max TDP: |
140 Watts
|
Although the specifications are similar to the previous
Phenom II processors, the main difference is of the course the processor speed
which is 3.4Ghz and the TDP which has been increased to 140 Watts because
of the added power consumption of a faster core.
In terms of power consumption, the Phenom II
x4 965 is still an eco-friendly CPU and even with the additional speed
in terms of Gigahertz, the increased consumption is debatable. During
our initial testing, even when
the CPU was stressed, the power consumption was relatively low which
great news for everyone.
Either way, it's still a positive step in
the right direction for AMD and the results from our tests proved this
quite clearly. Although
it should be mentioned that testing and benchmarking is subjective,
we endeavored to ensure that the test components included new equipment
as not to disadvantage the CPU. Nonetheless, testing will always be
objective due to the amount of PC configurations available.
System Specifications (Test Machine)
Motherboard - Gigabyte
GA-MA790GP-DS4G
Graphics Card - HD4870 X2
Memory - 2048MB (2 x 1024MB) Kingston Memory
Hard Drive - Seagate Constellation 500GB
Power Supply - Titan 850W ATX Intel AMD PC
Case Power Supply
Operating System - Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate Edition
(64-bit) with SP
We also tested the AMD Phenom II X4 965 on a fresh installation of Windows
Vista 64-bit and once the installation was complete and all the relevant drivers were installed, we noticed a considerably improved
performance over
our previous Phenom II setup, including our Intel machine of similar
specifications.
The boot-up time was considerably faster and loading
programs such as Microsoft Office or Adobe CS4 was pure bliss. Surfing
the net, archiving, accessing files was a very snazzy experience. For
official testing (that can be tested), we used the following software packages and games;
In regards to overclocking, none of our tests involved an overclocked
Phenom II X4 965, however AMD have given users the software needed to
overclock this baby should they feel the need.
Although after our tests, we did successfully push this CPU
to almost 4Ghz with the appropriate cooling devices. It's ironic that
overclocking was frowned upon the industry once upon a time, however now,
it is considerably more common, especially with the affordable price of
processors. Comparisons with Intel, probably the Intel Core i7-920 and
Q9550 but in our books, the AMD Phenom II X4 965 is the choice for us.
SiSoft Sandra
SiSoft's Sandra 2009 is one
of the world's most definitive and trusted programs as it supports the
latest CPU and hardware configurations. SiSoftware Sandra 2009 stands
for
System ANalyser, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant)
or Sandra for short. Best of all, results of other configurations and
CPU's are also available, ensuring for great comparisons.
SiSoft Sandra
Sandra cache and memory bandwidth
(11.2) Intel Core i7-920
(9.5) AMD Phenom II X4 965
(8.8) AMD Athlon II X2 250
SiSoft Sandra
CPU-Z memory access latency
(16MB block, 512 byte-stride)
(58) Intel Core i7-920
(54) AMD Phenom II X4 965
(49) AMD Athlon II X2 250
After a variety of tests with SiSoft
Sandra, the Phenom II X4 965 was in the range of the big boys, that
being near Intel's Core i7 CPU's which is great news for AMD. With
memory usage and CPU usage, the Phenom has the power and capabilities to
produce some great performance. Although Intel may be quicker in
relation to certain office suites, with the Dragon platform, the Phenom
II X4 965 is definitely challenging Intel extremely closely.
WorldBench
WorldBench is similar to SiSoft and gives
the user an almost flawless windows application benchmark. Best of all,
the scores are recorded by the developers of this program and it allows
for some great comparisons. The Phenom II X4 965 once again showed
scores in the top ten of CPU's in the world at the moment.
World Bench - Overall Results
(124) Intel Core i7-920
(118) AMD Phenom II X4 965
(101) AMD Athlon II X2 550
World Bench - Microsoft Office 2003 SP1
(322) AMD Phenom II X4 965
(328) Intel Core i7-920
(324) AMD Athlon II X2 550
World Bench - Firefox Browsing
(219) AMD Phenom II X4 965
(249) Intel Core i7-920
(248) AMD Athlon II X2 550
World Bench - WinZip 10
(187) Intel Core i7-920
(240) AMD Phenom II X4 965
(236) AMD Athlon II X2 550
Ironically, the Phenom II X4 knocked over
Intel's Q9550 in quite a few tests, however in comparison to the Core
i7-920, it just lost in terms of an overall score. Price, performance,
the X4 is still winning though.
3DMark06
3DMark06 is another definitive benchmarking program
and although slightly dated, it is a great tool for an overall benchmark
of your system. It was developed by the Futuremark Corporation to determine the
performance of a computer's 3D graphic rendering and CPU workload
processing capabilities. Once again, the Phenom II X4 965 boasted high
scores.
3DMark06
(4874) Intel Core i7-920
(4811) AMD Phenom II X4 965
(2443) AMD Athlon II X2 550
Crysis Warhead
Crysis is still one of those games that requires a huge amount of CPU
processing and GPU processing and we can safely say that we have yet to
meet a PC which can run it perfectly. What were those developers
thinking? Featuring aliens and amazing weaponry, Crysis Warhead is the
first person shooter that many dream of running it at full detail. For
this review, we tested it out at 1920x1200 and 1280x1024 on high detail.
Interesting enough, the processor knocked over some of the Intel scores
at higher resolutions.
Crysis Warhead
1920x1200
(52) Intel Core i7-920
(51) AMD Phenom II X4 965
(44) AMD Athlon II X2 550
Crysis Warhead
1280x1024
(71) Intel Core i7-920
(62) AMD Phenom II X4 965
(50) AMD Athlon II X2 550
Bioshock
This Australian made game is still one of the most popular games
available and with Bioshock 2 on the horizon, gamers across the world
are eagerly awaiting the sequel. The Phenom II X4 965 performed
remarkable well on Bioshock which is great news for Bioshock 2. Pushing
Intel to the side, the Phenom II X4 965 proves that this processor is a
king in terms of gaming.
Bioshock
1920x1200
(125) AMD Phenom II X4 965
(105) Intel Core i7-920
(100) AMD Athlon II X2 550
Bioshock
1280x1024
(196) AMD Phenom II X4 965
(160) Intel Core i7-920
(155) AMD Athlon II X2 550
Call of Duty World at War
Another first person shooter that is considered by many as the best
online experience in the world. Set in World War II, this game features
stunningly realistic graphics and some of the best gameplay in years.
Once again the Phenom II X4 965 pushed it's closest Intel competitors
with some impressive scores.
Call of Duty World at War
1920x1200
(57) AMD Phenom II X4 965
(56) Intel Core i7-920
(30) AMD Athlon II X2 550
Call of Duty World at War
1280x1024
(75) AMD Phenom II X4 965
(74) Intel Core i7-920
(60) AMD Athlon II X2 550
Final Thoughts
In conclusion, the
Phenom II X4 965 is a very powerful CPU and it's
great to see AMD take the fight closer to Intel. In comparison with the
previous Phenom II models, the increased speed and performance of the
Phenom II X4 965 is quite visible. In reference to benchmarking, the
processor is definitely at the high end of CPU's but best of all, the
price is more affordable.
Although as a workhorse PC, Intel
slightly has an edge over AMD, however when it comes to gaming,
especially with the Dragon platform, the Phenom II X4 965 is no slouch
and easily beat Intel in quite a few gaming tests.
With the higher end Intel CPU's, the Phenom II X4 965 is no match,
however for price and performance, it's definitely a contender in the
industry.
Check it out! |